Al-Sharḥ al-MumtiʿIbn al-'Uthaymin

His statement, “then [he should pray] facing a line,” means: he should pray facing a line. The line must leave a mark on the ground, because in former times the ground was covered with sand or pebbles, and when a person drew a line, it produced a clear mark. But mosque floors nowadays are carpeted. So can we say that a line formed by the colouring of the carpet suffices in place of a line that leaves a mark?

Some scholars have said: Anything that one considers to be a sutrah (prayer barrier) suffices. The apparent implication of this is that even a coloured line would suffice, but there is some reservation about this.

The apparent view is that these coloured lines are not sufficient. However, if there happened to be a raised thread at the edge of a mat or carpet, it would be valid for it to serve as a sutrah, because it is raised.

The evidence for this is that the Prophet ﷺ said: “…and whoever cannot find one, let him draw a line.” (2) Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said concerning this hadith in Bulugh al-Maram: “Those who claimed it to be inconsistent have not been correct; rather, it is sound.” (3) This is because Ibn al-Salah, may Allah have mercy on him, said that it was inconsistent, and an inconsistent hadith is one of the categories of weak hadith. A sound hadith is authoritative, because, according to the well-known definition, it establishes a preponderant probability: it is that which is narrated by an upright transmitter whose precision is somewhat less than complete, through a connected chain, and is free from irregularity and any discrediting defect.

Accordingly, the hadith is authoritative. Thus, if you cannot find an upright object

(1) Al-Insaf, 3/640. (2) Narrated by Imam Ahmad, 2/249; Abu Dawud, Book of Prayer, chapter: “Drawing a line when one cannot find a stick” (689); and Ibn Majah, Book of Establishing the Prayer, chapter: “What serves as a prayer-screen for the worshipper” (943). (3) Bulugh al-Maram, p. 249.
قوله: «فإلى خطٍّ» أي: فيُصلِّي إلى خطٍّ، والخطُّ له أثرٌ بالأرض، لأنَّ الأرض فيما سَبَقَ مفروشة بالرَّمْلِ أو بالحصباء، وإذا خطَّ الإنسانُ صار له أثرٌ بيِّنٌ، لكن أرض المساجد الآن مفروشة بالقماش، فهل نقول: إن الخط الذي هو خطُّ التلوين يجزئ عن الخطِّ الذي له أثرٌ؟ قال بعض أهل العلم: يجزئ كلُّ ما اعتقده سُتْرة (١)، وظاهره: حتى الخط الملوَّن، لكن في النفس مِن هذا شيء. فالظاهر: أن هذه الخطوط الملونة لا تكفي، لكن لو فُرض أن فيه خيطاً بارزاً في طرف الحصير، أو في طرف الفراش لصحَّ أن يكون سُتْرة، لأنه بارز. والدليل على ذلك أن النبيَّ ﷺ قال: « … فمَنْ لم يجدْ فَلْيَخطَّ خطًّا» (٢). وهذا الحديث قال عنه الحافظ ابن حجر في «بلوغ المرام»: «ولم يصب من زعم أنه مضطرب بل هو حسن» (٣) لأن ابن الصلاح ﵀ قال: إنه مضطرب، والمضطربُ من أقسام الحديث الضعيف. والحسن حُجَّة؛ لأنه يوجب غلبةَ الظَّنِّ حسب التعريف المعروف، وهو: ما رواه عدل خفيف الضبط بسند متَّصلٍ، وسَلِمَ من الشذوذ والعِلَّة القادحة. وعلى هذا؛ فيكون الحديث حُجَّة، فإذا لم تجد شاخصاً
(١) «الإنصاف» (٣/ ٦٤٠). (٢) أخرجه الإمام أحمد (٢/ ٢٤٩)؛ وأبو داود، كتاب الصلاة، باب الخط إذا لم يجد عصاً (٦٨٩)؛ وابن ماجه، كتاب إقامة الصلاة، باب ما يستر المصلي (٩٤٣). (٣) «بلوغ المرام» (٢٤٩).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies