He travelled to Damascus with his father and other relatives while still a child, and there he listened to hadith from Ibn ʿAbd al-Dāʾim, Ibn Abī al-Yusr, Ibn ʿAbd, Shaykh Shams al-Dīn al-Ḥanbalī, the Ḥanafī judge Shams al-Dīn ibn ʿAṭāʾ, Shaykh Jamāl al-Dīn ibn al-Ṣayrafī, Majd al-Dīn ibn ʿAsākir, Shaykh Jamāl al-Dīn al-Baghdādī, Najīb al-Dīn al-Miqdād, Ibn Abī al-Khayr, Ibn ʿAllān, Abū Bakr al-Harawī (1), Kamāl al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥīm, Fakhr ʿAlī, Ibn Shaybān, Sharaf ibn al-Qawwās, Zaynab bint Makkī, and many others.
He undertook extensive private reading, diligently pursued hadith study, compiled works of ṭibāq and athbāt, and for many years attended audition sessions in person, all the while devoting himself to the various sciences.
Exceptionally intelligent and endowed with a prodigious memory, he became an imām in Qurʾanic exegesis and its affiliated disciplines, fully versed in jurisprudence, the points of disagreement among the jurists, the two foundational sciences (2), grammar, philology, and other transmitted and rational fields. Any scholar who conversed with him on a particular discipline (3) would conclude that that discipline (4) was his own specialty, so evident was his mastery of it.
As for hadith, he was a ḥadith master (ḥāfiẓ) (5), able to distinguish its sound reports from its weak ones, thoroughly acquainted with the transmitters, [and deeply proficient in all of that] (6).