Al-Uqud al-DurriyyaIbn Abd al-Hadi

of the Prophet ﷺ and the graves of the other prophets—may Allah’s blessings be upon them—as a sin that is categorically and unanimously agreed upon. This is what he wrote! So look at the distortion foisted upon Shaykh al-Islām. The reply contains no prohibition whatsoever against visiting the graves of the prophets and the righteous. It merely cites (1) two opinions regarding shadd al-rahl (undertaking a special journey) and travelling solely to visit graves. Visiting graves without shadd al-rahl is one issue, whereas saddling up and travelling for no purpose other than the visit is another.

The Shaykh does not forbid visits that entail no journey; on the contrary, he considers them recommended and encourages them. His books and his manuals for the rites of pilgrimage attest to this. In that fatwa he did not even address such visits, nor did he brand them sinful, nor did he claim a consensus banning them. Allah, exalted is He, nothing is hidden from Him.

When the letter in the judge’s own hand reached Egypt, the talk multiplied and the turmoil intensified. The judges there (2) were summoned, they gathered and conferred, and some of them proposed imprisoning the Shaykh. The sultan endorsed the proposal, and the events already mentioned then unfolded (3).

After that, things befell those who had pursued this case that cannot be recounted in this place (4).

(1) MS B reads: “fihi dhikr” (there is a mention of it). (2) Immediately afterwards, MS F adds: “wajtamaʿ biha” (and they gathered around it). (3) Cf. p. 396 and the following pages. (4) It would have been preferable had he recorded them in full; earlier he had only alluded to some of what befell them (pp. 397–398).
النبيّ ﷺ وقبور الأنبياء صلوات الله عليهم معصيةً بالإجماع مقطوعًا بها. هذا كلامه! فانظر إلى هذا التحريف على شيخ الإسلام! والجواب ليس فيه المنع من زيارة قبور الأنبياء والصالحين. وإنما فيه ذِكْر (١) قولَين في شدِّ الرّحل والسفر إلى مجرَّد زيارة القبور. وزيارةُ القبور من غير شدِّ رَحْلٍ إليها مسألةٌ، وشدُّ الرّحْلِ لمجرَّد الزيارة مسألةٌ أخرى. والشيخُ لا يمنع الزيارة الخالية عن شدِّ رَحْل، بل يستحبّها، ويندُب إليها. وكُتُبه ومناسكه تشهد بذلك، ولم يتعرَّض الشيخ إلى هذه الزيارة في الفتيا، ولا قال: إنَّها معصية، ولا حكى الإجماعَ على المنع منها. والله ﷾ لا تخفى عليه خافية. ولمَّا وصل خطُّ القاضي المذكور إلى الديار المصرية، كَثُرَ الكلامُ وعَظُمت الفتنة، وطُلِبَ القضاة بها (٢)، فاجتمعوا وتكلّموا، وأشار بعضُهم بحبس الشيخ، فرسم السلطان به، وجرى ما تقدَّم ذكره (٣). ثم جرى بعد ذلك أمورٌ على القائمين في هذه القضية لا يمكن ذِكْرها في هذا الموضع (٤).
(١) (ب): «فيه ذكر». (٢) بعده في (ف): «واجتمع بها». (٣) (ص ٣٩٦ وما بعدها). (٤) ليته ذكرها مفصلًا، وسبقت إشارته إجمالًا إلى بعض ما وقع لهم (ص ٣٩٧ ــ ٣٩٨).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies