Al-Uqud al-DurriyyaIbn Abd al-Hadi

The judge, however, flew into a rage and said, “If he is not returned to my jail, I shall depose myself.” (1) The Commander of the Emirs placated him by sending Shaykh Jamal al-Din back to prison, holding him in al-Qawṣiyya for a few days.

Shaykh Taqi al-Din then informed the viceroy of the harm that had befallen some of his companions during the latter’s absence. The viceroy therefore ordered that a group from among Ibn al-Wakil’s followers be imprisoned, and he had it proclaimed throughout the city: “Whoever speaks about creed, his property and his blood are forfeit, and his house and shop shall be plundered.” (2) His aim in this was to quell mischief and strife. (3)

On Tuesday, the seventh of Shaʿban, a third session was convened for Shaykh Taqi al-Din in the palace, and the assembly voiced its approval of the creed.

That same day the Chief Judge, Najm al-Din Ibn Ṣaṣrā, resigned from the judiciary because of something he heard from Shaykh Kamal al-Din Ibn al-Zamlakani—words I prefer not to repeat. (4)

On the twenty-sixth of Shaʿban a letter arrived from the Sultan instructing the judge to resume his post. It stated: “We had ordered that a session be held for Shaykh Taqi al-Din, and news has reached us of the sessions that have indeed been convened for him and that he follows the way of the Salaf. Our only purpose in this was to clear his name.”

(1) Manuscript F reads: “habs” (imprisonment). (2) Manuscripts F and K read: “damahu wa malahu” (his blood and his property); manuscript F also adds: “wa nahb” (and plunder). (3) Manuscript K reads: “al-fitan wa-sharr” (strife and evil). (4) See Majmu al-Fatawa 3:172–174 for a detailed account of what transpired; also al-Jamiʿ – Nihayat al-Arab, pp. 174–175, and its supplement Dhayl al-Mirʾah, p. 21.
وغضبَ القاضي وانزعج وقال: لئن لم يُرَدَّ إلى حبسي (١) عزلتُ نفسي. فأرضاه ملك الأمراء بأن أعاد الشيخ جمال الدين إلى حبسه، فاعتقله بالقوصيَّة أيَّامًا. وذكر الشيخُ تقيُّ الدين للنائب ما وقع في غَيْبته في حقِّ بعض أصحابه من الأذى، فرسَمَ بحبس جماعةٍ من أصحاب ابن الوكيل، وأمر فنودي في البلد: إنه من تكلَّم في العقائد حلَّ ماله ودمه، ونُهِبَت (٢) دارُه وحانوته. وقَصَدَ بذلك تسكين الشرِّ والفتن (٣). وفي يوم الثلاثاء سابع شعبان عُقِدَ للشيخ تقي الدين مجلسٌ ثالث بالقصر، ورضي الجماعة بالعقيدة. وفي هذا اليوم عَزلَ قاضي القُضاة نجم الدين بن صَصْرى نفسَه عن الحكم بسببِ كلامٍ سمعه من الشيخ كمال الدين بن الزّمْلكاني لا أحبُّ حكايتَه (٤). وفي اليوم السادس والعشرين من شعبان وردَ كتابُ السلطان إلى القاضي بإعادته إلى الحكم، وفيه: إنا كنَّا رَسَمْنا بعَقْدِ مجلس للشيخ تقيّ الدين، وقد بلغنا ما عُقِدَ له من المجالس، وأَنه على مذهب السلف. وما قَصَدْنا بذلك إلّا براءة ساحته.
(١) (ف): «حبس». (٢) (ف، ك): «دمه وماله»، و (ف): «ونهب». (٣) (ك): «الفتن والشر». (٤) انظر «مجموع الفتاوى»: (٣/ ١٧٢ - ١٧٤) ففيه حكاية ما جرى بالتفصيل. و «الجامع ــ نهاية الأرب»: (ص ١٧٤ - ١٧٥)، و «تكملته ــ ذيل المرآة»: (ص ٢١).

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Why Translate?

Support

  • Contact us
  • Report a bug
  • Support us
  • Donate
  • AI combat arena

Follow us

© 2026 Kutub. All rights reserved.
Terms and conditionsPrivacy policyCookies